Old Testament
Book Five:
Deuteronomy
Primary Charge of Moses to the People (cont’d)
Chapter 3: A review
of Israel’s journey (cont’d)
Chapter 4: An
exhortation to obey the law
Deuteronomy is apparently mostly Moses talking to Israel
before they go into Canaan. It’s funny,
because last time I was conned into thinking, oh, look, God finally did fulfill
his promise and now they are in Canaan.
But of course that’s not true!
They aren’t in Canaan yet at all, they’re still on the other side of the
valley. What’s with all the
stalling? Well, we’ll have to wait and
see. It’s interesting that Moses was
supposed to be the one to lead them out of slavery to the promised land, and he
doesn’t actually get it done. Instead,
here, he tells them that Joshua will be their next leader. Apparently the book of Joshua is going to be
the record of their conquest of Canaan—if it actually happens, we’ll have to
wait and see.
These are just some random thoughts I had reading these two
chapters. I might have to limit my
reading to two chapters for the time being.
It’s just too brutal to read four chapters in a day. Oh, this is interesting. Apparently reading the bible in a year is
something fundamentalist Christians like to do to show how devout they
are. It fits nicely at 4 chapters a day,
it takes around eight or nine months.
(The idea that someone would read this book in order to get inspiration
for their lives is really laughable to me, but whatever. What in the world does Jane Christian get out
of reading Leviticus?!)
Something occurred to me reading today. There is nothing in the Old Testament about
salvation, or heaven and hell. It just
doesn’t exist. The word “heaven” appears
frequently, but it doesn’t mean “the place you go after you die”; it just means
out there, the other place, God. We’ll
see. Moses is going to die in a few
days, at the end of this book. Let’s see
what happens. It’s interesting that
Jesus is the only one who ever “ascended” to heaven, because the very concept
makes no sense in the Old Testament. What’s
interesting about this is just how insanely disconnected the Old and New
Testaments are. They have nothing to do
with each other. It’s just bizarre that
Christians believe the Old Testament is part of their religion. But they have to, because it is the entire
way ALL religious movements exist, right?
You don’t argue that everything they ever thought is wrong, and so here,
I’m going to tell you the truth. You say
exactly what Jesus said, they’re not wrong, they just don’t quite get it
right. I am the one who can properly
interpret YOUR religion. Not forget
yours, follow mine. It’s exactly what
Paul did with Jesus. Muhammad did the
same thing. Joseph Smith did the same
thing. David Koresh did the same
thing. It’s all the same thing. Even the Jewish priests do it book by book in
the Old Testament. They reinterpret the
rules to fit the new situation.
Another thing, it is simply amazing that we ended up with
this religion rather than some other one.
It is clear from the Old Testament there were tribes running around the
Middle East, and that each one had its own similar dumb religion. (And as I’ve talked about may times, the Old
Testament is in fact an conglomeration of older beliefs reimagined to support
this new religion.) Is there anything to
learn from the fact that this one survived?
Or is it truly random? And of
course, while Judaism is still with us, it’s not even Judaism that survived,
it’s Christianity. And it’s only half
Christianity, it’s also half Islam. But
it all stems from these dumb tribal disputes 5000 years ago. WHY?
Here is one theory. Sort of gets
back to Nietzsche. There is something
particularly weak about the European mind, and Paul hit on the perfect message
for them: don’t worry that you’re a
loser, it will all be better after you die.
What a fantastic message for someone too weak not to take that drink,
huh? And in a weird way, the defeated
other tribes in Arabia, the Canaanites and Moabites and so on, they didn’t go
anywhere. They stayed right where they
were, and they did this amazing judo move to flip the whole thing on its head
and use Christianity to go back to saying no we are in charge. It’s all amazing and amazingly pointless.
I have another question.
What the hell is really going on with this story. Is there really a nomadic tribe running
around winning battle after battle, apparently taking over a city, raping the
women, then leaving to move on? It’s so
bizarre! And it sounds from this book
like they could never lose. This is the
way the Middle East (the Bedouins and so on) were—they were nomadic. (I get this from Seven Pillars of Wisdom,
which I haven’t read in a long time, so I may be drastically misrepresenting
it.) These nomadic tribes were just the
way of life on the Arabian peninsula for a long time. But so did the Israelites really always
win? Or did the always lose? Did they really stage themselves above Canaan
and then attack? With what? HOW did these battles go? It’s all so weirdly false sounding, but at
the same time maybe not. I don’t know,
it’s just a very interesting question.
I have one thought, here in Deuteronomy we may still be back
in pre-historic times. These stories may
still be legend more than factual record.
It may be that all this is leading up to Joshua’s attack on Canaan, to
sort of explain why the Israelites took over Canaan? That’s a possible—these five books give the
Israelites a reason to believe in themselves and obey their leaders.
Oh yeah, something that supports this hypothesis, the notes
say that Deuteronomy appears to have been written as an address to the kingdom
of Judah. If that’s true, this may all
be exactly what I just said it was. Tall
tales you tell your children about previous conquests in order to instill pride
and obedience.
--bibletoenail
No comments:
Post a Comment