Old Testament
Book Five:
Deuteronomy
Primary Charge of Moses to the People (cont’d)
Chapter 5: A review
of the covenant at Sinai
Chapter 5 (cont’d):
Exhortations and warnings
Chapter 6: Fidelity
to the one Lord
It’s interesting. God
made a mistake in his covenant with Israel.
He promised salvation, but it wasn’t conditional on anything. So throughout these books he has had to
breach the contract over and over by adding new conditions—“I know I promised
you, but first you have to . . .” It is
really pathetic and dishonest. This one
detail is enough to make this God simply not worthy of following, and it is THE
Jewish God.
In this one way, Christianity is much smarter than Judaism.
God made an entirely different promise.
In Christianity, he makes an individual covenant with each
follower. So each individual follower
can uphold his end of the bargain or not.
If one Christian fails, he
goes to hell without effecting the rest of the flock. (There’s one small problem with this, which
is that, for example, maybe my heaven wouldn’t be heaven without my wife or
Elvis, but if they both sinned, then they have to go to hell and heaven can’t
be heaven for me. I think a real Christian
would easily dismiss this argument. When
people say “Elvis must be with John Lennon in heaven right now” or whatever,
they are misunderstanding heaven. Heaven
is about being with God, that is the thing that is going to be so awesome about
heaven. It’s not about reuniting with
your loved ones. If Christians let a
follower believe they will be reunited, it destroys the advantage of one-on-one
covenants. This is a really subtle
problem. We humans don’t want one-on-one
covenants, we all want to go to heaven together. Hm.
God could just not be a dick and let us all go together. (This reuniting issue is a fundamental
problem with Mormonism, I think.)
Anyway, I noticed something else. There are subtle indications throughout the
Bible that this God isn’t the only god.
He says he’s the only god, but he means that he’s the only one for you;
he doesn’t actually mean he’s the only god.
He says “I am a jealous god.”
What does that MEAN? It means that
there are many possible gods, but the one you have is a jealous god. Just one more among the infinite
contradictions in the bible.
A little interesting.
The question is why tell these rules again. It is explained in 5.22–31. In Exodus when Moses went to the mountain, they
were all afraid. They were afraid that
if they encountered God personally and heard him speak they would die, so they
had to have Moses go talk to God for them.
(This is where the “Horned Moses” comes from—after speaking to God his
face shone, almost like it was bright and glowing and smoking after his
encounter with God in the fire.) So, at
that time God gave them some of the rules, the ones they needed. Now he’s going to give them more rules, the
ones they will need for after they occupy Canaan.
Chapter 6, The Shema.
Notes say this is the “Jewish Creed,” the statement is the standard
preface to private and public prayer in the Jewish tradition. Then verses 10 to 15 say again that you must
follow Him, no other god from the nations around you. Man, I don’t see how you can read that except
as acknowledging the legitimacy of the other gods. This is a real Derrida moment. Saying there is only one god admits that
there are more than one god. Why would
you even need to say that otherwise? I
know what religious people would say, he’s saying the other gods are false
gods, so you have to follow the real one.
But that really is not the way it sounds here. He says explicitly, “You shall fear the Lord
your God, serve him alone and take your oaths in his name.” How else can you read that? If it’s possible to “serve” another god, a
god that isn’t real, then what is the point?
What difference does it make?
Doesn’t this acknowledge that the whole religious enterprise is fake,
right here in the bible?
Verses 4 and 5 say, “Hear, O Israel, the Lord is our God,
one Lord, and you must love the Lord your God with all your heart and soul and
strength.” The notes say that Mark
describes those verses as “the greatest commandment.” (Mk. 12.28–34.) We need to keep an eye on these kind of
comments, because of course this book has one of the most bizarre twists in the
history of literature, right, that it turns out everything everyone believed
for the first 5000 years was wrong, until Jeezy-Creezy comes along and explains
the opposite? It’s amazingly stupid,
isn’t it? But what is fascinating is
that Jesus and his disciples were all Jewish!
I mean really Jewish, not just “my mom is Jewish,” but the whole point
of Jesus is to explain the proper way to be Jewish.
I have to say that so far, six chapters in, this book is not
as painfully boring to read as the last couple.
Moses is going to go through the rules again, but so far it seems to be
written differently, more rhetorically and less mechanically. Not so bad.
--bibletoenail
No comments:
Post a Comment